Carter, DeLuca & Farrell LLP is pleased to share that Alexandra Jabour has been admitted to the Bar and has been named an Associate with our firm. Alexandra has assisted…
Read More
Contact Us
P.(631) 501-5700
F.(631) 501-3526
Latest News
Carter, DeLuca & Farrell LLP is proud to announce that Amber N. Roibu has been admitted to the Bar and is now an Associate with our firm. After joining the…
Read More
Carter, DeLuca and Farrell LLP partner George Likourezos recently published an article for Spotlight Family Office Group titled “Restaurant Owners (and Their Investors): The Importance of Registering Your Trademark, Slogan…
Read More
Carter, DeLuca and Farrell LLP partner George Likourezos recently published an article for Spotlight Family Office Group titled “Key Aspects for Companies and Individuals to Understand ITAR Compliance.” In the…
Read More
Carter, DeLuca and Farrell LLP partner George Likourezos recently published an article for Spotlight Family Office Group titled “Maximizing Efficiency and Protection: The Benefits of Track One and the Patent…
Read More
Carter, DeLuca and Farrell LLP partner George Likourezos recently published an article for Spotlight Family Office Group titled “Registering Trademarks Outside the United States: A Guide for Entrepreneurs.” In the…
Read More
Carter, DeLuca and Farrell LLP partner George Likourezos recently published an article for Spotlight Family Office Group titled “Considerations When Investing in Emerging Technology Companies.” George provides an overview of…
Read More
Carter, DeLuca and Farrell LLP partner Vadim Vapnyar recently participated in a panel discussion about creating successful industry-academic partnerships and navigating intellectual property challenges at the second annual "Merced to…
Read More
Carter, DeLuca and Farrell LLP recently sponsored one of the UC Santa Cruz Chancellor’s Innovation Impact awards, which recognize the outstanding research and creativity taking place across the university. Click…
Read More
Check out the Carter, DeLuca and Farrell LLP partner George Likourezos’ article for 3DHEALS LLC titled “Importance of Patent Search for Regenerative Medicine Inventions”. The article discusses four reasons why…
Read More
Treehouse owns U.S. Patent 8,180,858, which discloses a method of collecting data from an information network in response to user choices of a plurality of users navigating character-enabled network sites…
Read More
Uniloc sued Motorola for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,161,134 which district court dismissed because Uniloc had granted a license and the existence of the license deprived Uniloc of standing. …
Read More
Plaintiffs own four design patents on hoverboards. Plaintiffs brought suit against appellants (who sell Gyroor-branded hoverboards) claiming that products sold by appellants infringed plaintiffs’ patents. The district court entered a…
Read More
IBM sued Zillow for infringement of seven patents, including U.S. Patent No. 9,158,789 (related to coordinated geospatial, list-based and filter-based selection) and U.S. Patent No. 7,187,389 (related to methods of…
Read More
Mr. Weisner sued Google LLC for infringement, asserting four patents. Google moved to dismiss, arguing 1) that the asserted patent claims are ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and 2)…
Read More
Merck owns U.S. Patent 7,326,708, which describes sitagliptin dihydrogenphosphate, a dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (“DP-IV”) inhibitor, which can be used for treating non-insulin-dependent (i.e., Type 2) diabetes. Mylan petitioned for inter partes…
Read More
Cooperative sued Kollective for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,432,452 relating to systems and methods of structuring a peer-to-peer (P2P) dynamic network for distributing large files, namely videos and video…
Read More
Weber petitioned for inter partes review (“IPR”) of claims 1–14 of Provisur’s U.S. Patent No. 6,997,089 relating to methods and systems for classifying slices of a food product using an…
Read More
Polaris filed a complaint accusing NVIDIA of infringing certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,532,505 and 7,405,993, and NVIDIA responded by filing IPR petitions challenging certain claims in those patents.…
Read More
Sawstop appeals the District Court’s denial of its challenge to the PTO’s interpretation of 35 U.S.C. § 154(b)(1)(C)(iii) and the denial of Sawstop’s requests for adjustment to the term of U.S.…
Read More